Direct Purchase v Managed Funds?

Discussion in 'Share Investing Strategies, Theories & Education' started by Strawbs, 27th Aug, 2012.

Join Australia's most dynamic and respected property investment community
  1. Strawbs

    Strawbs Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    23
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Assuming I have a long-term focus (which I do).... Why would I buy blue chip shares directly when I have to pay for each buy transaction when I could put my money into a managed fund which has (all but) the same shares in its portfolio that I am looking for? One answer which comes to mind is I can control my portfolio whereas the managed fund might make buy/sell decisions I don’t agree with but is there anything else I am missing?
     
  2. jabba_jones

    jabba_jones Active Member

    Joined:
    1st Jul, 2015
    Posts:
    43
    Location:
    Sydney
    Investing into a fund means:

    Ongoing management fees
    You generally pay a Buy/Sell spread covering the brokerage costs of the fund
    Realised capital gains from Fund trading giving you a tax liability you wouldn't have if you held directly.
    Forfeited Franking credits due to funds trading around ex dates

    Lastly, not so much on Blue Chips, but there is liquidity risk, funds can freeze redemptions.
     

Build Passive Income WITHOUT Dropping $15K On Buyers Agents Each Time! Helping People Achieve PASSIVE INCOME Using Our Unique Data-Driven System, So You Can Confidently Buy Top 5% Growth & Cashflow Property, Anywhere In Australia