Navra's Tax Optmisation structure

Hi all, I interested in starting a thread to discuss Steve Navra's tax optimisation structure.

This could help others too who may have questions along the way. Just curious if there is any interest and where would be the appropiate place to start. Surely there must be lots of opinions and views ... perhaps even some confusion ?

 

Hi Sim, were you able to record the Q & A session (presuming there was one)?
Cheers

 

Thanks Sim, I'll look forward to whatever you can make from it. Had intended to be there but one thing and another, something called life just made it impractical.
Cheers

 

Sim, was this after the presentation at the Vibe hotel ? I had to take off after the official presentation was over.

 

Got it. Silly question ... what is GTP ?

 

HtL
GTP = Great Southern Plantation
Jayar

 

Should be GSP not GTP then right ?

 

Steve Navra's tax optimisation structure

Sim,

Is there a relatively simple explanation of the Navra tax optimisation structure for those that have not been fully exposed to it before....perhaps a post or series of posts on investEd somewhere, or something written by Steve? Posting/revising something like that might be a good way to get this discussion string going.

Regards,
Mark Leo.

 

Sim did you ever get around to this?

 

Just a question for those who have decided to invest in the 2007 Great Southern Plantations project via NavraInvest.

Can anyone give their interpretation of the following statements from the PDS.

"In the event that the fees and rent payable by Growers in year four of the relevant Project, or in any year onwards, up to but not including the Termination year are not sufficient to cover the Minimum cost for that year, then that shortfall amount may be deducted by the RE from the Growers returns in the following year. If the growers return in that following year are not sufficient to meet the shortfall amount then growers will be required to pay the amount of the shortfall amount that is not met by the borrowers returns in that following year" P24 2nd last paragraph.

"The annual Vineyard rental fee is only applicable in the years that net annual harvest proceeds are generated" P25 first paragraph

"Minimum Cost means in relation to a financial year, $260 per vinelot for the financial year 1 july 2010 to 30 June 2011 multiplied by the number of vinelots least by the grower and then that amount indexed by the CPI movement in each following financial year of the relevant project" P83 Minimum cost definition

My understanding is that after the 4th year, if the grapes don't make a return for 2 years in a row the grower will have to pay $260 per vinelot indexed against inflation. Does this seem right? Just trying to understand all possible future fees and charges that are involved.

 

*BUMP*

How did you go with the audio and powerpoint Sim, i'd still be keen to look, listen and learn

 

Ah yes, and I was so looking forward to sharing some constructive thoughts on this creative structure...

GSJ

 

It would be great to have this on DVD!

 

Hi David

Hypothetically, if such a DVD was for sale, how much would you pay for it?

Cheers
N.

 

I'd probably pay up to $99 for it.

I've read in the past that Steve conducted these seminars at cost price. If this were the same for the DVD version, I'd imagine it would cost less.

I think a digital download at say $39 would be great.

 

Thanks for the feedback David.

I'll explore it with Steve...but no promises okay! From looking into it previously, it's actually quite expensive to put something like this together...

Cheers
N.